Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:53:25 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] documentation: Clarify wake-up/memory-barrier relationship |
| |
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:24:19PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > This commit adds an example demonstrating that if a wake_up() doesn't > actually wake something up, no memory ordering is provided. > > Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |