lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: S5PV210 platform clean-up
Date
Am Samstag, 5. Juli 2014, 13:00:43 schrieb Tomasz Figa:
> On 05.07.2014 06:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> This huge series is a (hopefully final) attempt to convert Samsung
> >> S5PV210
> >> into a DT-only and multiplatform-aware platform. It consists of several
> >> steps to gradually replace legacy code with one meeting current standards
> >> and then finally remove unused remnants.
> >>
> >> Patches 1-6 migrate the platform to fully use the Common Clock Framework
> >> and get rid of legacy private clock code, of which s5pv210 was the last
> >> user. Then patch 7 adds generic PHY driver for USB PHY on S5PV210 to
> >> allow
> >> USB to be supported when using DT. Further three patches (8-10) add DT
> >> support for mach-s5pv210 and necessary DT sources for currently supported
> >> boards. Patch 11 removes board files and code directly related to them,
> >> effectively making s5pv210 a DT-only platform. In next step, patches
> >> 12-15
> >> prepare remaining code for multiplatform enablement, which is finally
> >> done
> >> in patch 16. Patches 17-19 are a final clean-up, which remove a lot of
> >> unused code left after making the last S5P platform DT-only.
> >>
> >> Build tested patch by patch on following configs:
> >> - s3c2410_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
> >> - s3c6400_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
> >> - s5pv210_defconfig (with DT support enabled after patches adding it),
> >> - exynos_defconfig,
> >> - exynos_defconfig with S5PV210 enabled in multiplatform configuration.
> >>
> >> Boot tested on s5pv210-goni board.
> >>
> >> Note that support for smdkc110, smdkv210 and torbreck boards is provided
> >> by moving data from existing board files to new device tree sources. No
> >> testing was performed due to mentioned board not being available anymore.
> >> However I believe we agreed on this approach, because apparently there
> >> are no active users of them. See the RFC from August 2013 asking for
> >> removal of the whole platform [1].
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc%40vger.kernel.org/msg21882
> >> .html>>
> >> Tomasz Figa (13):
> >> cpufreq: s3c24xx: Remove some dead code
> >> cpufreq: s5pv210: Make the driver multiplatform aware
> >
> > Looks like you used --suppress-cc=all while sending these and none of
> > CPUFreq/PM guys received it :(
>
> Oops, I had a feeling that I has screwed up something with this series
> and now we know what. Sorry for this. Will resend properly next Tuesday.

I got the cover-letter 3 times (19:44, 19:46 and 19:48). The one from 19:48
also did contain all 19 patches ;-)


Heiko



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-05 13:41    [W:0.039 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site