lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v4 2/2] backlight: device tree: add new tps611xx backlight binding
>     > +- rfa-enable: enable request for acknowledge.
> > +  If RFA is enabled, the data byte includes the RFA bit and device will
> wait
> > +  and check acknowledge from device.
>
> You didn't answer my question as to why this should be in the DT.
>
>
> According to the RFA enable, the easy scale pin works differently.
> This value should be set before the first data transfer.

Sure, things works differently if this is set. That I understood.

What I haven't heard is a rationale as to why this configuration option
shuold be in the DT.

Can I enable this on all implementations, or not?

When would I enable this and when would I not?

The property reads like a switch to turn a feature on, rather than the
description of the presence of a feature.

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-04 19:01    [W:0.040 / U:6.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site