lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottomley@parallels.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 1:03 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; hch@infradead.org; sitsofe@gmail.com;
> devel@linuxdriverproject.org; apw@canonical.com;
> martin.petersen@oracle.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> ohering@suse.com; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; jasowang@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 19:05 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@oracle.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:03 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: Martin K. Petersen; Sitsofe Wheeler; Christoph Hellwig;
> > > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > devel@linuxdriverproject.org; ohering@suse.com; apw@canonical.com;
> > > jasowang@redhat.com; jbottomley@parallels.com; linux-
> > > scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks
> > > tests
> > >
> > > >>>>> "KY" == KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> writes:
> > >
> > > KY,
> > >
> > > KY> "At the time thin-provisioning was defined, the discovery
> > > KY> information was first proposed in READ CAPACITY 16 command. And
> > > then
> > > KY> moved into the new dedicated VPD page - B2h. You can see the
> > > KY> information reported in this VPD page is richer than READ
> > > KY> CAPACITY
> > > KY> 16 command. As this transition happened during we added the
> > > KY> feature, Windows uses the newer method that based on VPD page
> > > KY> B2h. It looks Linux tries to use both new and old method which is
> weird to me."
> > >
> > > The READ CAPACITY(16) response is not optional.
> >
> > Ok; that settles the issue then. I will attempt to get it fixed on Windows.
>
> Like Martin says, this isn't optional either/or; it's mandatory to support the RC
> 16 bits. If you don't want to get into playing the messenger between us and
> the windows guys on SCSI standards, we'd be happy to communicate
> directly, either by email or a phone meeting.

Thanks James. I will take up your offer if needed.

Regards,

K. Y
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-28 22:41    [W:0.076 / U:2.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site