lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: at91: spi: request all csgpio in spi probe
Hi,

Dne 28.7.2014 v 14:21 Alexandre Belloni napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for that patch, a few questions/comments below.
>
> On 28/07/2014 at 13:43:40 +0200, Jiri Prchal wrote :
>> This fix problem with PA14 set as periph A left from ROMBOOT and need it
>> to be set to gpio before spi bus communicate with chip on CS0 on other
>> gpio. As I reported a week ago.
>> Request all csgpios in spi_probe since cs depends on each other and must
>> be all of them in right state before any communication on bus. They are
>> part of bus, like miso, mosi, clk, not part of chips, they are defined
>> in parent spi node, not in child chip node.
>> Csgpio moved to atmel_spi struct as part of master bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Prchal <jiri.prchal@aksignal.cz>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
>> index 92a6f0d..1fb7bb9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
>> @@ -22,11 +22,14 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_data/dma-atmel.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>>
>> +#define DRIVER_NAME "atmel-spi"
>> +
>
> This is not really related to the issue solved by that patch, maybe it
> could go in another patch ?
Probably yes, but is used for this patch, I based it upon spi-efm32.
>
>> /* SPI register offsets */
>> #define SPI_CR 0x0000
>> #define SPI_MR 0x0004
>> @@ -242,11 +245,13 @@ struct atmel_spi {
>>
>> bool keep_cs;
>> bool cs_active;
>> +
>> + /* chip selects */
>> + unsigned int csgpio[];
>> };
>>
>> /* Controller-specific per-slave state */
>> struct atmel_spi_device {
>> - unsigned int npcs_pin;
>> u32 csr;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -312,7 +317,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>> }
>>
>> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
>> - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
>> + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active);
>> } else {
>> u32 cpol = (spi->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SPI_BIT(CPOL) : 0;
>> int i;
>> @@ -329,18 +334,16 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
>> mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
>> if (spi->chip_select != 0)
>> - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
>> + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active);
>> spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
>> }
>>
>> dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "activate %u%s, mr %08x\n",
>> - asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (high)" : "",
>> - mr);
>> + as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active ? " (high)" : "", mr);
>> }
>>
>> static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>> {
>> - struct atmel_spi_device *asd = spi->controller_state;
>> unsigned active = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH;
>> u32 mr;
>>
>> @@ -354,11 +357,10 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>> }
>>
>> dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "DEactivate %u%s, mr %08x\n",
>> - asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (low)" : "",
>> - mr);
>> + as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active ? " (low)" : "", mr);
>>
>> if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) || spi->chip_select != 0)
>> - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active);
>> + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], !active);
>> }
>>
>> static void atmel_spi_lock(struct atmel_spi *as) __acquires(&as->lock)
>> @@ -989,8 +991,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> struct atmel_spi_device *asd;
>> u32 csr;
>> unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word;
>> - unsigned int npcs_pin;
>> - int ret;
>>
>> as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>>
>> @@ -1017,27 +1017,13 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBS, 0);
>> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT, 0);
>>
>> - /* chipselect must have been muxed as GPIO (e.g. in board setup) */
>> - npcs_pin = (unsigned int)spi->controller_data;
>> -
>> - if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
>> - npcs_pin = spi->cs_gpio;
>> -
>> asd = spi->controller_state;
>> if (!asd) {
>> asd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct atmel_spi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!asd)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - ret = gpio_request(npcs_pin, dev_name(&spi->dev));
>> - if (ret) {
>> - kfree(asd);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> - asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
>> spi->controller_state = asd;
>> - gpio_direction_output(npcs_pin, !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
>> }
>>
>> asd->csr = csr;
>> @@ -1290,6 +1276,15 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int ret;
>> struct spi_master *master;
>> struct atmel_spi *as;
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + int num_cs, i;
>> +
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + num_cs = of_gpio_named_count(np, "cs-gpios");
>> + if (num_cs < 0)
>> + return num_cs;
>>
>
> This driver can still be probed without DT, this will break here, please
> don't assume that DT is present.
Yes, but I copied it from spi-efm32 and looked at others, is almost the same.
>
>
>> /* Select default pin state */
>> pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(&pdev->dev);
>> @@ -1308,7 +1303,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> /* setup spi core then atmel-specific driver state */
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*as));
>> + master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*as) + num_cs * sizeof(unsigned));
>> if (!master)
>> goto out_free;
>>
>> @@ -1317,7 +1312,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 16);
>> master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> master->bus_num = pdev->id;
>> - master->num_chipselect = master->dev.of_node ? 0 : 4;
>> + master->num_chipselect = num_cs;
>
> My guess is that you don't need to change that part.
I think I need it. What about 3 cs?
>
>> master->setup = atmel_spi_setup;
>> master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message;
>> master->cleanup = atmel_spi_cleanup;
>> @@ -1325,6 +1320,25 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> as = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
>>
>> + for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; ++i) {
>> + ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
>
> Again, DT maybe not be compiled in or that driver may be probed from
> platform data.
Is another way how to do it? I see cs-gpios in master struct, but where it gets filled.
>
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get csgpio#%u (%d)\n",
>> + i, ret);
>> + goto out_free;
>> + }
>> + as->csgpio[i] = ret;
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "csgpio#%u = %u\n", i, as->csgpio[i]);
>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, as->csgpio[i],
>> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, DRIVER_NAME);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "failed to configure csgpio#%u (%d)\n",
>> + i, ret);
>> + goto out_free;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Scratch buffer is used for throwaway rx and tx data.
>> * It's coherent to minimize dcache pollution.
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-28 15:41    [W:0.170 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site