Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:30:02 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: kGraft to -next [was: 00/21 kGraft] |
| |
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 06/25/2014 01:05 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: ... > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/kgraft.git/log/?h=kgraft > > Stephen, > > may I ask you to add the kGraft tree to -next? > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/kgraft.git#kgraft
Do we have consensus on the approach? I personally really don't like the fact that it's adding another aspect to kthread management which is difficult to get right and nearly impossible to verify automatically.
IIUC, there are three similar solutions. What are the pros and cons of each? Can we combine the different approaches?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |