lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/5] phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a subnode


On Wednesday 02 July 2014 05:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Monday 30 June 2014 08:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a DT subnode
>>>
>>> This has the added advantages of being able to enable/disable each
>>> of the channels as simply as enabling/disabling the DT node.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>>> index 1109f42..2c4ea6e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>
> [...]
>
>>> -static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct device_node *np,
>>> +static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> struct miphy365x_dev *phy_dev)
>>> {
>>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + struct device_node *child;
>>> + int child_count = 0;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
>>> + child_count++;
>>
>> use of_get_child_count() instead.
>
> Ah, nice. I'll do that.
>
> [...]
>
>> I think you can merge this to your original patch.
>
> I can do that, but I thought It'd be nice to keep some history and
> show the migration over to a different setup. This is particularly
> important for when we back-port the changes back into the internal
> development kernel.

cool.. i'm fine with it.

Cheers
Kishon


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-02 14:41    [W:0.068 / U:7.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site