lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre/lustre/lov: Remove unneeded 'if' statement in lov_request.c/lov_check_set()
Date
It is silly to go through an if statement to set a single boolean
value in function of a single boolean expression. In the function
lov_check_set, assign the return value directly.

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index ce830e4..90fc66a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -140,14 +140,13 @@ void lov_set_add_req(struct lov_request *req, struct lov_request_set *set)

static int lov_check_set(struct lov_obd *lov, int idx)
{
- int rc = 0;
+ int rc;
mutex_lock(&lov->lov_lock);

- if (lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
- lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
- (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
- class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried))
- rc = 1;
+ rc = lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
+ lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
+ (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
+ class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried);

mutex_unlock(&lov->lov_lock);
return rc;
--
1.9.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-19 22:21    [W:0.670 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site