Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:38:43 -0400 | From | Johannes Weiner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: unlock_page page when forcing reclaim |
| |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:48:02AM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > A small userland program I wrote to assist me in drive forensic > operations soft deadlocked on Linux 3.14.4. The stack trace from /proc > was: > > [<ffffffff8112968e>] sleep_on_page_killable+0xe/0x40 > [<ffffffff81129829>] wait_on_page_bit_killable+0x79/0x80 > [<ffffffff811299a5>] __lock_page_or_retry+0x95/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8112a95b>] filemap_fault+0x21b/0x420 > [<ffffffff8115685e>] __do_fault+0x6e/0x520 > [<ffffffff81156de3>] handle_pte_fault+0xd3/0x1f0 > [<ffffffff81157073>] __handle_mm_fault+0x173/0x290 > [<ffffffff811571d2>] handle_mm_fault+0x42/0xb0 > [<ffffffff81587a11>] __do_page_fault+0x191/0x490 > [<ffffffff81587dec>] do_page_fault+0xc/0x10 > [<ffffffff81584622>] page_fault+0x22/0x30 > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff > > The program used mmap() to do a linear scan of the device on 64-bit > hardware. The block device in question was 200GB in size and the system > had only 8GB of RAM. All IO operations stopped following pageout. > > shrink_page_list() seemed to have raced with filemap_fault() by evicting > a page when we had an active fault handler. This is possible only > because 02c6de8d757cb32c0829a45d81c3dfcbcafd998b altered the behavior of > shrink_page_list() to ignore references. Consequently, we must call > unlock_page() instead of __clear_page_locked() when doing this so that > waiters are notified. unlock_page() here will cause active page fault > handlers to retry (depending on the architecture), which avoids the soft > deadlock.
I don't really understand how the scenario you describe can happen.
Successfully reclaiming a page means that __remove_mapping() was able to freeze a page count of 2 (page cache and LRU isolation), but filemap_fault() increases the refcount on the page before trying to lock the page. If __remove_mapping() wins, find_get_page() does not work and the fault does not lock the page. If find_get_page() wins, __remove_mapping() does not work and the reclaimer aborts and does a regular unlock_page().
page_check_references() is purely about reclaim strategy, it should not be essential for correctness.
| |