[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust
Hi David,

If patches from integrity/next-trusted-keys goes via your tree, then I
suggest that you re-base your patches on the top of our
patchset, because it is unclear how long review of PE, PKCS7 patches
will take and if they will be pulled...

I would do it with different pull requests.

- Dmitry

On 10/07/14 00:29, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Mimi Zohar <> wrote:
>>> Yes, that's fine. My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring
>>> patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should
>>> be upstreamed regardless of the other patches.
>> There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from
>> my pkcs#7 patches.
> Right, x509_request_asymmetric_key() is the same as
> pkcs7_request_asymmetric_key().
> Mimi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-10 18:01    [W:0.101 / U:5.608 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site