lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: report driver's successful {un}registration
From
On 10 July 2014 19:37, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:38:23PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The problem with that is: CPUFreq may not be compiled in at all and we
>> wouldn't know the difference between success and absence.
>
> Of course you would: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/

Yeah, with a local board its easily detectable.

But I faced the issue when I had to see some test reports from
the automated stuff and wanted to see if cpufreq is up and running.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-10 16:41    [W:0.087 / U:23.872 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site