lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/9] slab: defer slab_destroy in free_block()
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> In free_block(), if freeing object makes new free slab and number of
> free_objects exceeds free_limit, we start to destroy this new free slab
> with holding the kmem_cache node lock. Holding the lock is useless and,
> generally, holding a lock as least as possible is good thing. I never
> measure performance effect of this, but we'd be better not to hold the lock
> as much as possible.
>
> Commented by Christoph:
> This is also good because kmem_cache_free is no longer called while
> holding the node lock. So we avoid one case of recursion.
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Not sure what happened to my

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

from http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139951092124314, and for the
record, I still think the free_block() "list" formal should be commented.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-02 01:01    [W:0.098 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site