lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6] NVMe: conversion to blk-mq
On 2014-06-09 08:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:08:50AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> [ 487.704074] nvme 0000:00:07.0: Cancelling I/O 202 QID 1
>>> [ 487.717881] nvme 0000:00:07.0: Aborting I/O 202 QID 1
>>> [ 487.736093] end_request: I/O error, dev nvme0n1, sector 91532352
>>> [ 487.747378] nvme 0000:00:07.0: completed id 0 twice on queue 0
>>>
>>>
>>> when running fio randread(libaio, iodepth:64) with more than 3 jobs.
>>>
>>> And looks no such failure when jobs is 1 or 2.
>>
>> It's a known issue, make sure you have this patch:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://git.kernel.dk/?p%3Dlinux-block.git%3Ba%3Dcommit%3Bh%3Df6be4fb4bcb396fc3b1c134b7863351972de081f&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=3JMVyziIyZtZ5cv9eWNLwQ%3D%3D%0A&m=MKK7A%2B9AnXXwtMV9YPSFEprXId0z0WLtd2JQPxnaNVc%3D%0A&s=45425e5d17390ae912457035ff081b95a7084725706ffe91166a1bdb25d8bf3d
>
> So without this patch we can get duplicate completions? That could
> explain the issues that Robert sees with scsi-mq and hpsa..

I don't see how that would happen in general, except if the timeout
part was buggy.

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-09 18:01    [W:0.377 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site