lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] rtmutex: Handle deadlock detection smarter
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:28:32 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -1112,7 +1134,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
> > + /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
> > + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);
>
> Why bother with passing in detect_deadlock then?
>
> Same goes for rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock().

Because that's part of the cleanup series to remove it and I did not
want mix stuff here.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-06 08:21    [W:0.706 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site