Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:22:20 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16 |
| |
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:17:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > Ingo is 'missing' most of the time, so while I sit here with a massive > > queue of patches its nearly impossible for me to get anything merged :-( > > Ugh. I'd love to get this whole locking stuff sorted out. At worst, > could you just set up a git tree of your own with the locking patches? > Or I could even just take an emailed patch-series, although I do > prefer the convenience of a git pull.. This has been going on for a > _loong_ time now.
I wrote a script a week or so ago that exports my quilt series to a git tree based on tip branches; the locking/core tree is:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git locking/core
It has the rwsem opt spinning patches and the qrwlock in.
I still need to look at the last qspinlock thing, the last time I looked at that the paravirt stuff wrecked the native case.
I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree based on your git tree I'll have to do some manual stuff but that is certainly possible.
Also, this 'obviously' does not have the normal tip build coverage, because I usually rely on the tip build robots to do that. But it does build and run for all my local machines.
| |