Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:06:27 -0700 (PDT) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH mmotm/next] mm: memcontrol: rewrite charge API: fix shmem_unuse |
| |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote: > > > > - return 0; > > > > + return -EAGAIN; > > > > > > Maybe it's time to document the shmem_unuse_inode() return values. > > > > Oh dear. I had hoped they would look after themselves. This one is a > > private matter between shmem_unuse_inode and its one caller, just below. > > Well, readers of shmem_unuse_inode() won't know that unless we tell them.
Add comments on the private use of -EAGAIN.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> ---
mm/shmem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 3.16-rc2-mm1+/mm/shmem.c 2014-06-30 15:05:50.736335600 -0700 +++ linux/mm/shmem.c 2014-06-30 18:00:02.820584009 -0700 @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int shmem_unuse_inode(struct shme radswap = swp_to_radix_entry(swap); index = radix_tree_locate_item(&mapping->page_tree, radswap); if (index == -1) - return -EAGAIN; + return -EAGAIN; /* tell shmem_unuse we found nothing */ /* * Move _head_ to start search for next from here. @@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ int shmem_unuse(swp_entry_t swap, struct cond_resched(); if (error != -EAGAIN) break; + /* found nothing in this: move on to search the next */ } mutex_unlock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex);
| |