lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] thermal: Add Tegra SOCTHERM thermal management driver
On 06/27/2014 02:11 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> This adds support for the Tegra SOCTHERM thermal sensing and management
> system found in the Tegra124 system-on-chip. This initial driver supports
> the four thermal zones with hardware-tracked trip points.

> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c

> +static struct tegra_tsensor t124_tsensors[] = {
> + {
> + .base = 0xc0,
> + .name = "cpu0",
> + .config = &t124_tsensor_config,
> + .calib_fuse_offset = 0x098,
> + .fuse_corr_alpha = 1135400,
> + .fuse_corr_beta = -6266900,
> + },

I wonder why some of those fields are named "fuse_xxx" when the values
are hard-coded in these tables rather than read from fuses? These values
don't seem to be used to adjust values read from fuses.

> +static int tegra_thermctl_get_temp(void *data, long *out_temp)

> + switch (zone->sensor) {
> + case 0:
> + val = readl(zone->tegra->regs + SENSOR_TEMP1)
> + >> SENSOR_TEMP1_CPU_TEMP_SHIFT;

Can't the register offset and shift be stored in *zone, so that this
whole switch can be replaced with something generic:

val = readl(zone->tegra->regs + zone->reg_offset) >> zone->value_shift;

> +static int tegra_soctherm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq <= 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get interrupt\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }

irq is assigned once here ... (see later)

> + for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {

Why "4"? Should the loop count be the ARRAY_SIZE(some array)? At the
very least, a named constant that describes the value would be useful...

> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, soctherm_isr,
> + soctherm_isr_thread,
> + IRQF_SHARED, "tegra_soctherm",
> + zone);

Why request the same IRQ 4 times here. Rather, shouldn't the IRQ be
requested once, and the ISR simply loop over the status register (or
whatever there are 4 of)?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-01 00:41    [W:0.234 / U:1.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site