Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:24:21 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu: uninline rcu_lock_acquire() and rcu_lock_release() |
| |
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:18:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello, > > May be correct this time ;) Based on paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next. > > 2/2 is new and hopefully trivial. But! the numbers look suspiciously > good, I do not understand where does the difference come from...
Probably from rcu_dereference_raw() and rcu_dereference_check(..., 1). ;-)
Queued and kicked off testing, both mine and (indirectly) Fengguang's.
Thanx, Paul
| |