lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.12 047/181] nfsd: don't try to reuse an expired DRC entry off the list
Date
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit a0ef5e19684f0447da9ff0654a12019c484f57ca upstream.

Currently when we are processing a request, we try to scrape an expired
or over-limit entry off the list in preference to allocating a new one
from the slab.

This is unnecessarily complicated. Just use the slab layer.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 36 ++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index b6af150c96b8..f8f060ffbf4f 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -132,13 +132,6 @@ nfsd_reply_cache_alloc(void)
}

static void
-nfsd_reply_cache_unhash(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
-{
- hlist_del_init(&rp->c_hash);
- list_del_init(&rp->c_lru);
-}
-
-static void
nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
{
if (rp->c_type == RC_REPLBUFF && rp->c_replvec.iov_base) {
@@ -416,22 +409,8 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)

/*
* Since the common case is a cache miss followed by an insert,
- * preallocate an entry. First, try to reuse the first entry on the LRU
- * if it works, then go ahead and prune the LRU list.
+ * preallocate an entry.
*/
- spin_lock(&cache_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&lru_head)) {
- rp = list_first_entry(&lru_head, struct svc_cacherep, c_lru);
- if (nfsd_cache_entry_expired(rp) ||
- num_drc_entries >= max_drc_entries) {
- nfsd_reply_cache_unhash(rp);
- prune_cache_entries();
- goto search_cache;
- }
- }
-
- /* No expired ones available, allocate a new one. */
- spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
rp = nfsd_reply_cache_alloc();
spin_lock(&cache_lock);
if (likely(rp)) {
@@ -439,7 +418,9 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
drc_mem_usage += sizeof(*rp);
}

-search_cache:
+ /* go ahead and prune the cache */
+ prune_cache_entries();
+
found = nfsd_cache_search(rqstp, csum);
if (found) {
if (likely(rp))
@@ -453,15 +434,6 @@ search_cache:
goto out;
}

- /*
- * We're keeping the one we just allocated. Are we now over the
- * limit? Prune one off the tip of the LRU in trade for the one we
- * just allocated if so.
- */
- if (num_drc_entries >= max_drc_entries)
- nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(list_first_entry(&lru_head,
- struct svc_cacherep, c_lru));
-
nfsdstats.rcmisses++;
rqstp->rq_cacherep = rp;
rp->c_state = RC_INPROG;
--
2.0.0


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-30 15:01    [W:0.407 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site