[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2 v2] HID: leds: Use attribute-groups in MSI GT683R driver
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:55:10PM -0700, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jiri Kosina <> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >
> >> Did you see the attribute-race series I posted? Not sure how best to
> >> handle the dependency, as those patches should probably go in through
> >> the LEDs tree, while the first patch in that series (adding the groups
> >> field) is a dependency for this patch.
> >>
> >> Jiri, how would this best be solved?
> >
> > I think the best course of action here is to gather Acks from the
> > respective maintainers, and take the whole lot trough a single tree
> > (probably the leds tree in this case) to avoid unnecessary intra-tree
> > dependencies in a rather straighforward situation like this.
> I think the better place is HID/input tree, since this patch depends
> on the initial one which is not in my tree.
> I'm going to merge Johan's whole patchset and this patch probably
> depends Johan's work too.

Dmitry has ACKed the input-patch and Bryan has applied that one and the
leds-patches to his tree (of which the first one is a dependency of this

Jiri, are you saying that the gt683r-driver should go in through his
tree as well, that is all three patches including the first that you
have already applied? I just assumed your for-next branch was immutable,
but perhaps I was mistaken.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-30 13:41    [W:0.077 / U:3.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site