Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Yan, Zheng" <> | Subject | [PATCH V4 16/16] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:50:53 +0800 |
| |
"Zero length call" uses the attribute of the call instruction to push the immediate instruction pointer on to the stack and then pops off that address into a register. This is accomplished without any matching return instruction. It confuses the hardware and make the recorded call stack incorrect.
We can partially resolve this issue by: decode call instructions and discard any zero length call entry in the LBR stack.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c index dd14f67..20ba2ef 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ enum { X86_BR_ABORT = 1 << 12,/* transaction abort */ X86_BR_IN_TX = 1 << 13,/* in transaction */ X86_BR_NO_TX = 1 << 14,/* not in transaction */ - X86_BR_CALL_STACK = 1 << 15,/* call stack */ + X86_BR_ZERO_CALL = 1 << 15,/* zero length call */ + X86_BR_CALL_STACK = 1 << 16,/* call stack */ }; #define X86_BR_PLM (X86_BR_USER | X86_BR_KERNEL) @@ -111,13 +112,15 @@ enum { X86_BR_JMP |\ X86_BR_IRQ |\ X86_BR_ABORT |\ - X86_BR_IND_CALL) + X86_BR_IND_CALL |\ + X86_BR_ZERO_CALL) #define X86_BR_ALL (X86_BR_PLM | X86_BR_ANY) #define X86_BR_ANY_CALL \ (X86_BR_CALL |\ X86_BR_IND_CALL |\ + X86_BR_ZERO_CALL |\ X86_BR_SYSCALL |\ X86_BR_IRQ |\ X86_BR_INT) @@ -662,6 +665,12 @@ static int branch_type(unsigned long from, unsigned long to, int abort) ret = X86_BR_INT; break; case 0xe8: /* call near rel */ + insn_get_immediate(&insn); + if (insn.immediate1.value == 0) { + /* zero length call */ + ret = X86_BR_ZERO_CALL; + break; + } case 0x9a: /* call far absolute */ ret = X86_BR_CALL; break; -- 1.9.0
| |