Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:09:59 +0200 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: Low-limit reclaim |
| |
On Wed 28-05-14 09:17:13, Greg Thelen wrote: [...] > My 2c... The following works for my use cases: > 1) introduce memory.low_limit_in_bytes (default=0 thus no default change > from older kernels) > 2) interested users will set low_limit_in_bytes to non-zero value. > Memory protected by low limit should be as migratable/reclaimable as > mlock memory. If a zone full of mlock memory causes oom kills, then > so should the low limit.
Would fallback mode in overcommit or the corner case situation break your usecase?
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
| |