lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/9] seccomp: split filter prep from check and apply
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:58:06PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for adding seccomp locking, move filter creation away
> from where it is checked and applied. This will allow for locking where
> no memory allocation is happening. The validation, filter attachment,
> and seccomp mode setting can all happen under the future locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> kernel/seccomp.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index afb916c7e890..edc8c79ed16d 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -515,6 +551,7 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode(unsigned long seccomp_mode, char __user *filter)
> current->seccomp.mode = seccomp_mode;
> set_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP);
> out:
> + seccomp_filter_free(prepared);
> return ret;
> }

I think this needs to be inside #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER to match
the definition of seccomp_filter_free:

../kernel/seccomp.c:554:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘seccomp_filter_free’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-26 15:01    [W:0.150 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site