lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 07/14] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC
Hello Krzysztof,

Thanks a lot for your feedback.

On 06/26/2014 11:31 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a few nit-picks below but overall everything looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
>

>> +
>> +static int max77802_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> + struct max77802_dev *max77802 = NULL;
>> + struct max77802_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&i2c->dev);
>> + unsigned int data;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (i2c->dev.of_node)
>> + pdata = max77802_i2c_parse_dt_pdata(&i2c->dev);
>> +
>> + if (!pdata) {
>> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "No platform data found.\n");
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + max77802 = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct max77802_dev),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (max77802 == NULL)
>
> It is inconsistent. Before you used "(!pd)" and "(!pdata)" so maybe
> stick to one format?
>

Right, I'll change to "(!max77802)" as well to be consistent.

>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int max77802_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *i2c = container_of(dev, struct i2c_client, dev);
>> + struct max77802_dev *max77802 = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
>> +
>> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
>> + enable_irq_wake(max77802->irq);
>> +
>> + disable_irq(max77802->irq);
>
> Can you add short comment why this is needed? I know why but just for
> future generations which will wonder: "why do we need to disable the IRQ
> while suspending?" :). Especially that this is rather a workaround for
> issue in other driver (I2C bus).
>

Good idea, I'll add a comment here on next version so code archaeologists can
figure out what what's going on here.

>> +
>> +#define MAX77802_IRQSRC_PMIC (0)
>
> Shouldn't it be BIT(0) or BIT(1)? It looks odd.
>
>> +#define MAX77802_IRQSRC_RTC BIT(0)
>
> Anyway, are these defines used anywhere? Seems not.
>

Yes, these defines were used in the max77802-irq.c so is a left over from the
regmap IRQ chip refactoring. I'll remove these and also the ones from max77686
driver.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>

Best regards
Javier


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-26 14:01    [W:0.100 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site