Messages in this thread | | | From | "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <> | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:54:49 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] man-pages: seccomp.2: document syscall |
| |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:04 AM, One Thousand Gnomes > <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:56:15 -0700 >> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Combines documentation from prctl, in-kernel seccomp_filter.txt and >>> dropper.c, along with details specific to the new syscall. >> >> What is the license on the example ? Probably you want to propogate the >> minimal form of the text in seccomp/dropper into the document example to >> avoid confusion ? > > What is the license of the other code examples in man-pages?
Typically, just the same as the rest if the page text. Perhaps that should be rethought for future examples. I haven't thought about it at length, but, at first glance, I'm not against having separate licenses for the page text and the code sample.
Cheers,
Michael
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
| |