lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] spi: sh-msiof: Add DMA support
From
Hi Mark,

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:16:20PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Add DMA support to the MSIOF driver using platform data.
>>
>> This doesn't apply against current code, can you please check and
>> resend?
>
> My patches were based on your for-next branch, which has
> commit 1e8231b79ccbb3e6e7b3f6af9f998dca16b00efe
> Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 29 17:21:25 2014 +0900
>
> spi: sh-msiof: remove unnecessary OOM messages

Sorry, wrong copy and paste, I meant:

commit b8fa0abd47f3f2fa47c1b2b06182c422d0c2350d
Author: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Date: Wed Jun 4 18:17:09 2014 +0400

spi: sh-msiof: Remove unnecessary platform_set_drvdata()

Drop call to platform_set_drvdata() as driver data is not used
anywhere in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>

> (from topic/cleanup), but topic/sh-msiof hasn't.

Do you want me to resend? Against which branch?

Basically I had to revert the above commit, as I do use the driver data.
So if I would rebase and resend against topic/sh-msiof, you'll get a merge
conflict when merging this into for-next.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-24 21:21    [W:0.034 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site