Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/22] Add and use pci_zalloc_consistent | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:15:58 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 07:24 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > $ cat ./scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/pci_zalloc_consistent.cocci > > > > /// > > > > /// Use pci_zalloc_consistent rather than > > > > /// pci_alloc_consistent followed by memset with 0 > > > > /// > > > > /// This considers some simple cases that are common and easy to validate > > > > /// Note in particular that there are no ...s in the rule, so all of the > > > > /// matched code has to be contiguous > > > > /// > > > > /// Blatantly cribbed from: scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci > > > > > > > > @@ > > > > type T, T2; > > > > expression x; > > > > expression E1,E2,E3; > > > > statement S; > > > > @@ > > > > > > > > - x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent(E1,E2,E3); > > > > + x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E1,E2,E3); > > > > if ((x==NULL) || ...) S > > > > - memset((T2)x,0,E2); > > > > > > I don't know much about SmPL, but wouldn't having that if statement > > > there reduce your matches? > > > > No, not really. > > > > Almost none of the pci_alloc_consistent calls > > do not have a test for failure immediately after > > them.
> Do not or do?
Sorry, English double negative.
As far as I know, almost every instance of pci_alloc_consistent is followed by an if.
Exceptions exist in:
drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/divasmain.c drivers/staging/slicoss/slicoss.c drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
There might be others, but I didn't look too hard.
> The advantage of the if is that you are sure that nothing strange happens > to x between alloc and memset. But a problem can be that sometimes people > allocate two things, and then do error checking for both of them. Then > you rule would not match. Or the set the return variable to an error code > before doing the check rather than in the if branch. > > You could put the following between the malloc and the memset in stead of > the if. > > ... when != ( f(...,x,...) | <+...x...+> = E3 ) > when != ( while(...) S | for(...;...;...) S ) > > This has given reasonable results for kmalloc and memset.
Thanks for that.
It might be nice to add that to the kzalloc example in scripts/coccinelle
| |