Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:50:02 +0200 | From | Marek Szyprowski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/11] usb: dwc2/gadget: ensure that all fifos have correct memory buffers |
| |
Hello,
On 2014-06-23 20:40, Paul Zimmerman wrote: >> From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@samsung.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 12:51 AM >> >> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >> >> Print warning if FIFOs are configured in such a way that they don't fit >> into the SPRAM available on the s3c hsotg module. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 1 + >> drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h >> index 1efd10c..067390e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h >> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ struct s3c_hsotg { >> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[ARRAY_SIZE(s3c_hsotg_supply_names)]; >> >> u32 phyif; >> + int fifo_mem; >> unsigned int dedicated_fifos:1; >> unsigned char num_of_eps; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c >> index 95b6dcb..21d21de 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c >> @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_init_fifo(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg) >> for (ep = 1; ep <= 15; ep++) { >> val = addr; >> val |= size << FIFOSIZE_DEPTH_SHIFT; >> + WARN_ONCE(addr + size > hsotg->fifo_mem, >> + "insufficient fifo memory"); >> addr += size; >> >> writel(val, hsotg->regs + DPTXFSIZN(ep)); >> @@ -3030,19 +3032,22 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_initep(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg, >> */ >> static void s3c_hsotg_hw_cfg(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg) >> { >> - u32 cfg2, cfg4; >> + u32 cfg2, cfg3, cfg4; >> /* check hardware configuration */ >> >> cfg2 = readl(hsotg->regs + 0x48); >> hsotg->num_of_eps = (cfg2 >> 10) & 0xF; >> >> - dev_info(hsotg->dev, "EPs:%d\n", hsotg->num_of_eps); >> + cfg3 = readl(hsotg->regs + 0x4C); >> + hsotg->fifo_mem = (cfg3 >> 16); >> >> cfg4 = readl(hsotg->regs + 0x50); >> hsotg->dedicated_fifos = (cfg4 >> 25) & 1; >> >> - dev_info(hsotg->dev, "%s fifos\n", >> - hsotg->dedicated_fifos ? "dedicated" : "shared"); >> + dev_info(hsotg->dev, "EPs: %d, %s fifos, %d entries in SPRAM\n", >> + hsotg->num_of_eps, >> + hsotg->dedicated_fifos ? "dedicated" : "shared", >> + hsotg->fifo_mem); >> } >> >> /** >> @@ -3495,8 +3500,8 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> s3c_hsotg_phy_enable(hsotg); >> >> s3c_hsotg_corereset(hsotg); >> - s3c_hsotg_init(hsotg); >> s3c_hsotg_hw_cfg(hsotg); >> + s3c_hsotg_init(hsotg); > This last hunk looks like it is not related to the rest of the patch? If > so, I think it should be a separate patch.
s3c_hsotg_hw_cfg() only reads hw configuration and some values read there (fifo_mem) are used in s3c_hsotg_init_fifo(), which is called from s3c_hsotg_init(). This chunk really belongs to this patch, although it might not be easy to notice it at the first glance.
Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
| |