lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/5] acpi, apei, ghes: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_APEI_NMI to make NMI error notification a GHES feature.


On 19.06.2014 16:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:02:57PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> Currently APEI depends on x86 architecture. It is because of NMI hardware
>> error notification of GHES which is currently supported by x86 only.
>> However, many other APEI features can be still used perfectly by other
>> architectures.
>>
>> This commit adds ARCH_HAS_ACPI_APEI_NMI which will be used in next patches
>> for NMI related code isolation in ghes.c file. Only NMI error notification
>> feature depends on x86 so let it be hard selected for x86 arch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index 3fc9b12..e1dc819 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ config X86
>> select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>> + select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_APEI_NMI
>> select HAVE_AOUT if X86_32
>> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING if X86_64
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
>> index c4dac71..9f6c3ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ config ACPI_APEI
>> select MISC_FILESYSTEMS
>> select PSTORE
>> select UEFI_CPER
>> - depends on X86
>
> Now this can practically be enabled on any architecture, AFAICT. Which
> is wrong.
>
> I think a better solution would be to have another HAVE_ symbol which
> each arch which sports APEI selects. Like in the diff below ontop of
> this patch, also incorporating Robert's comments.
>
> You'll have to do select HAVE_ACPI_APEI on arm too.
>
> Hmm?
>

Now that it turns out we have to provide at least tlb_flush_... arch
function, APEI can not be selected by any architecture. So you are right
I will introduce HAVE_ACPI_APEI in next version of patches. Thanks.

Tomasz


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-24 11:21    [W:0.126 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site