Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:39:37 +0530 | From | Tushar Behera <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos-audss: Keep the parent of mout_audss always enabled |
| |
On 06/25/2014 04:29 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Tushar, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.b@samsung.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Tushar Behera <tushar.b@samsung.com> writes: >>> >>>> When the output clock of AUDSS mux is disabled, we are getting kernel >>>> oops while doing a clk_get() on other clocks provided by AUDSS. >>>> >>>> Though user manual doesn't specify this dependency, we came across >>>> this issue while disabling the parent of AUDSS mux clocks. >>>> >>>> Keeping the parents of AUDSS mux always enabled fixes this issue. >>> >>> While this patch works (and fixes the boot problem for me), it seems >>> like it's papering over the real problem. >>> >> >> Thanks for testing. >> >>> Seems like the right fix is actually modelling the clocks properly so >>> that enabling a child clock ensures that the parent is also enabled. >>> >> >> Patch 2/3 was to ensure we have proper clock tree defined for >> Exynos5420. While testing with audio disabled, that patch alone fixed >> the issue. But when audio was enabled (and hence I2S0 was trying to >> access the clocks), we got some kernel oops during late booting, hence >> I came up this solution. >> >> The solution might be a little half-baked because of the urgency to >> push the fix, but will try to dig more into the issue on Monday when I >> resume office. > > Which Monday were you referring to? ;) >
Sorry that I couldn't get deeper into this issue. Thanks for reminding though.
> ...but in all seriousness do you have an official status update on > this patch? It seems as if it's not needed and all you need is > <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4333581/>, but it would be nice to > get an official confirmation.
I have tested various scenarios with only patch 2/3, which seems to be sufficient for the time being. I have not encountered the older issue till now. I was thinking of testing a bit further, but given that you have already asked for, we can go ahead with only patch 2/3 right now.
In case any further issue comes up, I will post patch 1/3 as per the review comments that I have got.
> > Thanks! > > -Doug > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
-- Tushar Behera
| |