[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Tux3 for review
On Saturday, June 21, 2014 12:29:01 PM PDT, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 14:58 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>> We already removed 450 lines of core kernel workarounds from Tux3 with
>> approach that was literally cut and pasted from one of Dave's
>> emails. Then
>> Dave changed his mind. Now the Tux3 team has been assigned a research
>> project to improve core kernel writeback instead of simply adapting the
>> approach that is already proven to work well enough. That is a rather
>> blatant example of "perfect is the enemy of good enough". Please read
>> thread.
> That's a bit disingenuous: the concern has always been how page forking
> interacted with writeback. It's not new, it was one of the major things
> brought up at LSF 14 months ago, so you weren't just assigned this.

[citation needed]



 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-22 06:01    [W:0.101 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site