Re: safety of *mutex_unlock() (Was: [BUG] signal: sighand unprotected when accessed by /proc)
On 06/13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Perhaps you can look at http://marc.info/?t=140207370200003 ? > > Looks good. Should I queue it with the other rtmutex stuff?