[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed and/or ACPI'ed devices
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Michael Lawnick <> wrote:
> Am 03.06.2014 13:18, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Michael Lawnick <> wrote:
>>> Am 02.06.2014 14:16, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>>>> Is this really so useful on embedded systems?
>>>> I was under the impression that this method was something used
>>>> on say PC desktops with temperature monitors and EEPROMs
>>>> on some I2C link on the PCB, usage entirely optional and fun
>>>> for userspace hacks.
>>> We use it for dynamic instantiating whole subsystems with multiplexers,
>>> sensors, controllers in an embedded system. The device list is taken from
>>> an
>>> I2C eeprom which gets read on hotplug.
>> Does this mean that you have stored the names (strings) that are used
>> by the Linux kernel for identifying the devices into your EEPROM?
>> That means that you have made the kernel-internal device driver names
>> an ABI which is unfortunate :-/
>> This is one of the reasons to why we insist on device tree: OS neutral
>> hardware description.
> The eeprom contains a device tree that is dynamically merged.

That is a kind of way of saying "yes we made the kernel-internal
driver named an ABI" I guess?

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-12 10:41    [W:0.052 / U:1.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site