lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/10] DMA, CMA: clean-up log message
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:18:53PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
> > 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
> >
> > And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
> > bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
> >
> > Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area().
>
> When I take a look, it just indicates cma_activate_area was called or not,
> without what range for the area was reserved successfully so I couldn't see
> the intention for new message. Description should explain it so that everybody
> can agree on your claim.
>

Hello,

I paste the answer in other thread.

This pr_debug() comes from ppc kvm's kvm_cma_init_reserved_areas().
I want to maintain all log messages as much as possible to reduce
confusion with this generalization.

If I need to respin this patchset, I will explain more about it.

Thanks.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-12 08:41    [W:0.321 / U:4.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site