[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kconfig fails: big select-based circular dependency
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:57:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Should we have a better separation between select and depends, i.e.
> should kconf plainly reject both being used on the same symbol?

> Is it ever valid to have a symbol that's both selected and used with depends on?

Architecture feature Kconfig symbols typically have the pattern that the
architecture selects ARCH_HAS_FOO and then code that needs the feature
depends on ARCH_HAS_FOO.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-12 15:01    [W:0.063 / U:36.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site