Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:26:45 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 23:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > is. And the result of (a * 100) / b may generally be different from > > > a * 100 / b for integers (if the division is carried out first). > > > > I thought that (a * 100) / b is always equivalent to a * 100 / b. > > I'm not actually sure if that's guaranteed by C standards.
It is. left to right, same precedence.
> It surely > wasn't some time ago (when there was no formal C standard).
c89 is 25 years ago now.
> Either way, in my opinion it's better to put the parens into the expression > in this particular case to clearly state the intention.
I don't think so.
| |