Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:14:53 +0300 | From | Stratos Karafotis <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup |
| |
On 10/06/2014 11:17 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:26:44 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >> On 06/10/2014 08:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 08:12:48 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>>> On 06/09/2014 02:01 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote: >>>>> Remove unnecessary blank lines. >>>>> Remove unnecessary parentheses. >>>>> Remove unnecessary braces. >>>>> Put the code in one line where possible. >>>>> Add blank lines after variable declarations. >>>>> Alignment to open parenthesis. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't have an issue with this patch in general but I would rather >>>> the cleanup be done when there is a functional change in the given >>>> hunk of code otherwise you are setting up a fence for stable/backporters >>>> of functional changes in the future. >>> >>> I actually prefer separate cleanups so as to avoid doing multiple things >>> in one patch. >>> >>> Rafael >>> >> I don't have strong feelings either way I was just trying to be kind >> to the maintainers of distro kernels. > > And mixing fixes with cleanups in one patch doesn't do any good to them. > > Trust me, I used to work for a distro. :-) >
So, should I proceed and split the patch or drop it? :)
Stratos
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |