lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
Sudeep,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@arm.com]
> Sent: 2014年4月30日 21:31
> To: Neil Zhang; Will Deacon
> Cc: Sudeep Holla; linux@arm.linux.org.uk;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@arm.com]
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> I think we need some input from the device-tree guys to see whether
> >> they would object to us solving this locally (in the PMU node) or not.
> >> Personally, I'd much prefer a general way to describe the need for
> >> pm-notifiers, but if that's not being looked at then we can cook
> >> something specifically for our needs.
> >>
> >
> > No input from device-tree guys :(
>
> The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]

Thanks for the information.
But it currently for device only, core related stuff are not supported.
And is it really good to register power provider for core and let vfp / pmu etc to get it?

>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/23/755


Best Regards,
Neil Zhang
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-05 09:21    [W:0.155 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site