Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 May 2014 19:23:38 +0400 | From | Sergei Shtylyov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Keep master role when SCO or eSCO is active |
| |
Hello.
On 05/30/2014 10:24 AM, Kiran Kumar Raparthy wrote:
> From: "hyungseoung.yoo" <hyungseoung.yoo@samsung.com>
> Preserve the master role when SCO or eSCO is active > as this improves compatability with lots of > headset and chipset combinations.
> This is one of the number of patches from the Android AOSP > common.git tree, which is used on almost all Android devices. > It looks like it would improve support for compatibility with > lot of headset,so I wanted to submit it for review to see > if it should go upstream.
> v2: Fixed formatting issues pointed by Sergei
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> > Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: hyungseoung.yoo <hyungseoung.yoo@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Jaikumar Ganesh <jaikumarg@android.com> > [kiran: Added context to commit message] > Signed-off-by: Kiran Raparthy <kiran.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > index 15010a2..48bc772 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > @@ -1915,6 +1915,14 @@ unlock: > hci_conn_check_pending(hdev); > } > > +static inline bool is_sco_active(struct hci_dev *hdev) > +{ > + if (hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, SCO_LINK, BT_CONNECTED) || > + hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ESCO_LINK, BT_CONNECTED))
The continuation line should start under the next character after ( on the previous line, according to the networking coding style. The way you formatted it, it visually groups with the following *return* statement...
> + return true; > + return false; > +} > + > static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > { > struct hci_ev_conn_request *ev = (void *) skb->data; > @@ -1961,7 +1969,9 @@ static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > > bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &ev->bdaddr); > > - if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) && (mask & HCI_LM_MASTER)) > + if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) && > + ((mask & HCI_LM_MASTER) || > + is_sco_active(hdev)))
Same comment.
> cp.role = 0x00; /* Become master */ > else > cp.role = 0x01; /* Remain slave */
WBR, Sergei
| |