lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Keep master role when SCO or eSCO is active
Hello.

On 05/30/2014 10:24 AM, Kiran Kumar Raparthy wrote:

> From: "hyungseoung.yoo" <hyungseoung.yoo@samsung.com>

> Preserve the master role when SCO or eSCO is active
> as this improves compatability with lots of
> headset and chipset combinations.

> This is one of the number of patches from the Android AOSP
> common.git tree, which is used on almost all Android devices.
> It looks like it would improve support for compatibility with
> lot of headset,so I wanted to submit it for review to see
> if it should go upstream.

> v2: Fixed formatting issues pointed by Sergei

> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
> Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: hyungseoung.yoo <hyungseoung.yoo@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaikumar Ganesh <jaikumarg@android.com>
> [kiran: Added context to commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Raparthy <kiran.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 15010a2..48bc772 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -1915,6 +1915,14 @@ unlock:
> hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_sco_active(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + if (hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, SCO_LINK, BT_CONNECTED) ||
> + hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ESCO_LINK, BT_CONNECTED))

The continuation line should start under the next character after ( on the
previous line, according to the networking coding style. The way you formatted
it, it visually groups with the following *return* statement...

> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct hci_ev_conn_request *ev = (void *) skb->data;
> @@ -1961,7 +1969,9 @@ static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &ev->bdaddr);
>
> - if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) && (mask & HCI_LM_MASTER))
> + if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) &&
> + ((mask & HCI_LM_MASTER) ||
> + is_sco_active(hdev)))

Same comment.

> cp.role = 0x00; /* Become master */
> else
> cp.role = 0x01; /* Remain slave */

WBR, Sergei



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-30 18:01    [W:0.039 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site