Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 May 2014 12:43:11 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C |
| |
On 05/29/2014 12:32 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Paul Gortmaker > <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:25 PM, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski >> <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote: >>> Commit-ID: 6f121e548f83674ab4920a4e60afb58d4f61b829 >>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6f121e548f83674ab4920a4e60afb58d4f61b829 >>> Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> >>> AuthorDate: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:19:34 -0700 >>> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> >>> CommitDate: Mon, 5 May 2014 13:18:51 -0700 >>> >>> x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C >> >> Just a heads up in case it hasn't been mentioned already; >> the x86 builds in linux-next which IIRC are done as cross >> compile on a powerpc box are failing as follows: >> >> VDSO2C arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c >> /bin/sh: line 1: 15995 Segmentation fault arch/x86/vdso/vdso2c >> arch/x86/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c >> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/vdso/vdso-image-64.c] Error 139 >> >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/11265454/ >> > > Egads. This wouldn't be a big-endian host by any chance? >
He said PowerPC; most but not all PowerPC systems are bigendian. Seems like a fair assumption to make.
-hpa
| |