Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 May 2014 10:26:27 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address |
| |
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:57:26PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:44:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I looked at that but it seems I already acked the regulator part of the > > > series and nothing else looked immediately relevant? > > > The series has cross dependencies (shared header include) and thus needs > > to have both the mfd and regulator portions merged together. You had > > mentioned in the v1 version that you'd like to take it through the > > regulator tree and so Lee's comments earlier were with regard to you > > taking the mfd portions. > > Right, OK - because it depends on the earlier MFD patches (I think?) I > was expecting it to be applied in MFD and merged over to regulator.
Great, that's all I needed to know. I'm on it.
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |