Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Wed, 21 May 2014 11:25:01 +0900 |
| |
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 09:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 22:39:28 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:03:43AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Is this a request for inclusion of those branches into linux-next > > > separately from the scsi tree itself? > > > > James said he wants to include it in the scsi tree, but given how late > > we are in the cycle I'd love to see separate exposure until that happens > > on a temporary basis. > > OK, I have added them from today (called scsi-core and scsi-drivers). > James, feel free to yell if that is not OK.
Let's try the process.
> If these are to stay > longer term (and I have no objections given your list of requirements), > then you should rename the branches (maybe to -next instead of -3.16).
I'll merge it into for-next in SCSI to make it easier.
> These will be merged after the scsi tree so that they effectively > disappear from my radar when they have been merged into James' tree. > > Currently you are the only contact for problems - let me know if I > should add someone else (or a list).
Also cc the scsi mailing list for merge problems, just in case.
Thanks,
James
| |