Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 May 2014 23:17:58 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for secondary I2C slave address |
| |
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:57:26PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:44:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I looked at that but it seems I already acked the regulator part of the > > series and nothing else looked immediately relevant?
> The series has cross dependencies (shared header include) and thus needs > to have both the mfd and regulator portions merged together. You had > mentioned in the v1 version that you'd like to take it through the > regulator tree and so Lee's comments earlier were with regard to you > taking the mfd portions.
Right, OK - because it depends on the earlier MFD patches (I think?) I was expecting it to be applied in MFD and merged over to regulator. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |