Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 May 2014 11:34:51 -0400 | From | Johannes Weiner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg, mm: introduce lowlimit reclaim |
| |
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:11:20PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 02-05-14 11:04:34, Johannes Weiner wrote: > [...] > > > @@ -2236,12 +2246,9 @@ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, > > > do { > > > struct lruvec *lruvec; > > > > > > - /* > > > - * Memcg might be under its low limit so we have to > > > - * skip it during the first reclaim round > > > - */ > > > - if (follow_low_limit && > > > - !mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(memcg, root)) { > > > + /* Memcg might be protected from the reclaim */ > > > + if (force_memcg_guarantee && > > > > respect_? consider_? > > enforce_ ?
A native speaker might be better at this, but to me it seems weird to enforce a promise. honor_memcg_guarantee?
| |