lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] memcg, mm: introduce lowlimit reclaim
    On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:11:20PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
    > On Fri 02-05-14 11:04:34, Johannes Weiner wrote:
    > [...]
    > > > @@ -2236,12 +2246,9 @@ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
    > > > do {
    > > > struct lruvec *lruvec;
    > > >
    > > > - /*
    > > > - * Memcg might be under its low limit so we have to
    > > > - * skip it during the first reclaim round
    > > > - */
    > > > - if (follow_low_limit &&
    > > > - !mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(memcg, root)) {
    > > > + /* Memcg might be protected from the reclaim */
    > > > + if (force_memcg_guarantee &&
    > >
    > > respect_? consider_?
    >
    > enforce_ ?

    A native speaker might be better at this, but to me it seems weird to
    enforce a promise. honor_memcg_guarantee?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-05-02 18:01    [W:4.199 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site