Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:39 -0500 (CDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] slub: reparent memcg caches' slabs on memcg offline |
| |
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> I admit that's far not perfect, because kfree is really a hot path, > where every byte of code matters, but unfortunately I don't see how we > can avoid this in case we want slab re-parenting.
Do we even know that all objects in that slab belong to a certain cgroup? AFAICT the fastpath currently do not allow to make that distinction.
> Again, I'd like to hear from you if there is any point in moving in this > direction, or I should give up and concentrate on some other approach, > because you'll never accept it.
I wish you would find some other way to do this.
| |