Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/3] (was: Re: PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily) | Date | Fri, 16 May 2014 02:45:35 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 01:13:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:53:16 AM Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 13 May 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[cut]
> > > > if (dev->power.direct_complete) { > > if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) { > > pm_runtime_disable(dev); > > if (dev->power.disable_depth == 1 > > && pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) > > goto Complete; > > pm_runtime_enable(dev); > > } > > dev->power.direct_complete = false; > > } > > That is a good idea, thanks!
New patches follow.
[1/3] is the core change with the above added.
> > Also, now that we have finally settled on the appropriate API, there > > needs to ba a patch updating the PM documentation. > > Absolutely. I thought about updating the documentation in the same patch > (at least the comments in pm.h), but I guess a separate patch for files > under Documentation/ may be better.
[2/3] is the corresponding documentation update (I hope I haven't overlooked anything important).
[3/3] is a resend of the ACPI PM patch on top of the core change.
Rafael
| |