lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 5/5] pci: keystone: add pcie driver based on designware core driver
Date
On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:01:32 Murali Karicheri wrote:
> +Sample bindings shown below:-
> +
> + - Remove ti,enable-linktrain if boot loader already does Link training and do EP
> + configuration.
> + - Remove ti,init-phy if boot loader already initialize the phy and sets up pcie
> + link

You actually have to document all the properties. Have a look at the
other bindings for what this means.

> +
> + pcie@21800000 {
> + compatible = "ti,keystone-pcie";
> + device_type = "pci";
> + clocks = <&clkpcie>;
> + clock-names = "pcie";

The dw-pcie binding lists two clocks.

> + #address-cells = >;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + reg = <0x21800000 0x1000>, <0x0262014c 4>;
> + reg-names = "reg_rc_app", "reg_devcfg";

There should be standard names that are documented in the binding.

> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; /* Error IRQ */

What are all these interrupts?

> + ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x21801000 0x21801000 0 0x0002000 /* Configuration space */
> + 0x81000000 0 0 0x24000000 0 0x4000 /* downstream I/O */
> + 0x82000000 0 0x50000000 0x50000000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */

Please move the config space into 'reg' now instead of 'ranges'.
This was a mistake earlier, and there are already other front-ends
doing the same thing.

> + num-lanes = <2>;
> + ti,enable-linktrain;
> + ti,init-phy;
> +
> + /* PCIE phy */
> + phys = <&pcie0_phy>;
> + phy-names = "pcie-phy";
> +
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>;
> + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &pcie_intc 1>, // INT A
> + <0 0 0 2 &pcie_intc 2>, // INT B
> + <0 0 0 3 &pcie_intc 3>, // INT C
> + <0 0 0 4 &pcie_intc 4>; // INT D

I think this is the wrong map-mask.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-15 18:41    [W:0.231 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site