lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: futex(2) man page update help request
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

> > If I'm wrong, or we can restore the futex() call, great. If not... Should
> > we keep the man-pages and document it as syscall(SYS_futex, ..., op, ...) ?
>
> +1, is there anything preventing adding a futex wrapper... glibc folks?

See what I said at
<https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9712#c4> (with references
to previous discussions). Someone needs to take the lead on pushing to
consensus the question of what syscalls should have wrappers in glibc, and
then implement the conclusions.

--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-15 17:41    [W:0.333 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site