Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Weijie Yang <> | Subject | [PATCH] zsmalloc: fixup trivial zs size classes value in comments | Date | Thu, 15 May 2014 16:38:31 +0800 |
| |
According to calculation, ZS_SIZE_CLASSES value is 255 on systems with 4K page size, not 254. The old value may forget count the ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE in.
This patch fixup this trivial issue in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> --- mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c index 36b4591..04a6000 100644 --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ #define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE /* - * On systems with 4K page size, this gives 254 size classes! There is a + * On systems with 4K page size, this gives 255 size classes! There is a * trader-off here: * - Large number of size classes is potentially wasteful as free page are * spread across these classes -- 1.7.10.4
| |