Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 May 2014 16:27:11 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check |
| |
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:44:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:00:09 -0700 > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Good points -- I was indeed thinking about stress testing instead of > > algorithmic testing. > > But doesn't lockdep use algorithmic tests too?
I suppose you could argue that there is no such thing as non-algorithmic testing, given that all test code uses an algorithm of some sort. Perhaps with the exception of letting your pet walk across the keyboard. ;-)
Perhaps I should have instead said that I was thinking about random testing instead of formal testing?
Thanx, Paul
| |