lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check
    On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:44:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:00:09 -0700
    > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > > Good points -- I was indeed thinking about stress testing instead of
    > > algorithmic testing.
    >
    > But doesn't lockdep use algorithmic tests too?

    I suppose you could argue that there is no such thing as non-algorithmic
    testing, given that all test code uses an algorithm of some sort. Perhaps
    with the exception of letting your pet walk across the keyboard. ;-)

    Perhaps I should have instead said that I was thinking about random
    testing instead of formal testing?

    Thanx, Paul



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-05-14 02:01    [W:5.041 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site